Is nuclear weapon the design mistake of our virtual world?
by Dr. Leonid Sakharov
In design of virtual reality game mistakes can be made. If our
reality is such game there is one apparent candidate for the
mistake namely possibility to create nuclear bomb. Why creators
of out world accompany it with instrument of total annihilation?
Was this unintentional or maybe the part of the plan?
Every big enough construction contains mistakes. The definition
of the big here is that it contains mistakes. Mistake is unintended
behavior. Really only developer of the system can know what his
purpose was when catastrophe hits his artifact. Who knows how
air travel industry would look like now would from very start
instead of inflammable hydrogen dirigibles use safe helium. Of
course it would terrible slows down advance of commercial usage
because higher cost of helium but there will be no traumatic
experience with Graf Zeppelin that essentially put brakes on
whole lighter-than-air aircrafts industry. Was this unconscious
mistake or educated choice between economical advantage and risk
of hitting disaster? The word mistake is obviously subjective
and used here for lack of better term only.
No matter intentionally or not when seeds of obliteration was
put into system they are dangerous as cancer for living being
for its existence. If we observe history of civilization there
will be found several such plants of possible suicide. Nuclear
energy in general and atomic weapon in particularly is the exhibit
one for existing of flaws in fine tuning physical constants of our reality.
It is obvious that would critical mass for atom bomb be not several
kilograms but tons (thousand times more) or energy output correspondently
less there would be no nuclear weapon developed. The same trick
can do smaller concentration of Uran in Earth core that depends
on location of supernovas around Sun, pure bad luck. Only very
small deviations from current values of physical constants are
enough to eliminate the root that leads to development of nuclear bomb.
Nuclear fusion is mandatory process for construction stars. There
is no Universe without nuclear fusion. There will be no heavy
chemical elements essentially only more or less dull nothing
spreading all around without any observer there. It is common
knowledge. What is not comprehended at the same level of conscious
is that the opposite process of nuclear fission, splitting atom
nucleus, is completely unnecessary for anything. Humanity lives
many millenniums without splitting atom nucleus and it was happy
enough existance. Nuclear power adds almost nothing to quality
of life. One can argue that electricity produced by nuclear plants
was consumed so it was helpful. It is true of course but was
this critically important to solve any real crisis before humanity?
I don’t think so. In fact a nuclear power in form atom bomb put
all of as at the edge of instant extinction at any given moment
just because of possible mistake of few persons or maybe even
only one politician.
Even if to presume that for unlimited clean energy supply humanity
in future would need power plants based on nuclear fusion (technology
that after century intensive development maybe will be industrially
used sometime in decades) even in this case the nuclear fission
is useless extra. The point is that intelligence design of human
civilization as place for virtual game would lose nothing without
nuclear weapon. All what was needed to make nuclear weapon impossible
to exist is small variation in peripheral physical constants
these will lead to less than two with half on average neutrons
freeing after splitting nucleolus of Uran. It would affect practically
nothing in history of our civilization before WW2. And there
would be no nuclear weapon after. Yes history would be dramatically
differ but there would be no trauma of permanent thinking that
stupid politician is able to kill everybody only because he is
fanatic of some economic principle like any economics could exist
after total end of life on Earth
How this erroneous invention of nuclear bomb could sneak into
design of our virtual reality against intention of creators?
It was too late in the game and unpredicted coincidences in specific
values of physical constants these make atom bomb durable. Timeline
between moment when Einstein equation shows equivalence between
mass and energy and holocaust entire city of Hiroshima contains
only four decades. Albert Einstein was able to see transformation
theoretical formulas from inked paper into weapon able to kill
every living thing at the surface of Earth including its creators
and him personally. Erroneous case of suicide by means to be
too cleaver it could be.
Time period from the point of no return when possibility of atom
bomb creation was determined in University of Chicago at Dec.
2 1942 till first acts of super mass murder in Hiroshima and
Nagasaki was only two and half years and only very few men knew
what Manhattan project is for. Then there was logical story of
political madness when egoistic impulses of every decision maker
whose near horizon selfishness had much higher priority compare
to impossible to comprehend for average brain real possibility
of end of the world. The fact is nevertheless that our game field
is still intact; that there was no global war since last nuclear
one. This fact can have more then one explanation even in a model
that it is virtual reality game field:
-
An invention and then instant spread of nuclear weaponry to the
point treating existence of our game field was completely unexpected
for developers. It had happened the very first time for any virtual
reality and was cooped at the fly to be contained at first and
step by step eliminating as fatal thread for game continuation.
That explanation is very unsettling because breaks modesty principle
to accept an idea of uniqueness of our virtual reality. But it
is probable enough to mention because everything sometimes happens
the very first time.
-
In our template model of virtual reality game there is implementation
of self-destruction mechanism in form global nuclear war to end
it for some reason with final spectacular firework like old casino
demolished to free space for new one. The end of our reality
could be triggered by lost of interest for souls to reincarnate
here in our world because obvious over population and exhaustion
of recourses. When players go away to other virtual games efforts
to support our one will be too costly especially taking into
account how complex and interconnected our reality developed
into by hi-tech. Other reason to end this game could be revelation
that we live in Matrix. If so reading this article by you brings
apocalypse closer.
-
It is also possibility that thread of nuclear annihilation is
the ordinary crisis for ordinary game field that sometimes is
overcome in part of game and sometimes not. The end of life here
is not a big deal until there are myriads other game fields to play.
-
Most possible to my mind is the option of numerous reboots. As
“Civilization” game has option to remember the any given time
step and if something goes wrong to be reloaded at any point
in past to try another pass to overcome crisis situation. There
were maybe thousands attempts to avoid exchange nuclear rockets
strikes during Caribbean Crisis in 1962. Would JFK not won Presidency
in 1960, somebody else was the first man in space instead charismatic
Yuii Gagarin, invasion of contras in Gulf of Pigs had differ
outcome with prolong fighting, Khrushchev would lose one of the
numerous internal Communist Party coups or even some historical
anecdote we even not remember in connection did not happen maybe
there were no path around annihilation of humanity then. Every
time when humanity destroyed itself creators of our reality stop
the clock and restarted history from some point earlier in hope
that unavoidable random variations of craps outcome sometime
permits to overcome mountain range of nuclear annihilation destiny.
If to think deeper about these options at some moment one can
come to the idea that all this options are not mutually exclusive.
The idea with reboot is the most optimistic except the situation
before each restart. Of course nobody remember the end of times
but many should have full experience. Maybe the effect of deja
wu is byproduct of such reboots?
Mar. 19, 2019; 10:03 EST